In an exclusive interview on February 13, 2025, Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre unveiled a bold vision for Canada’s immigration policy, drawing clear parallels to the era of former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
For those unfamiliar, Stephen Harper served as Canada’s 22nd Prime Minister from 2006 to 2015.
Poilievre’s proposal seeks to reduce the annual number of immigrants to around 250,000, aligning with the figures seen during Harper’s time, while also advocating for swift deportations of individuals who break Canadian laws.
Consult with an experienced immigration representative
This article delves into Poilievre’s strategy, analyzing its potential effects on Canada’s housing market, legal system, and demographic trends, along with a retrospective look at immigration policy under Harper’s leadership.
The Current Situation
Canada has witnessed a significant increase in permanent resident admissions in recent years. However, the immigration targets for 2025 have been reduced from 500,000 to 395,000.
Poilievre contends that this rapid growth is contributing to the ongoing housing crisis, where demand vastly outstrips supply, driving up housing prices and decreasing accessibility.
Revisiting Harper-Era Immigration Levels
Poilievre’s plan closely mirrors the immigration policies from Stephen Harper’s administration, which spanned from 2006 to 2015.
Harper’s Numbers: Under Harper, Canada’s annual immigration levels typically ranged between 200,000 and 250,000, a pattern that was consistent with the previous four decades.
Economic Class: Harper’s focus was on economic immigrants, with programs like the Canadian Experience Class emphasizing the integration of those already in Canada’s workforce.
Family Class: A shift was seen toward reducing the number of family-class immigrants, and super visas for parents and grandparents became more common, permitting visits but not permanent residency.
Refugees: While refugee admissions remained similar to previous governments, the approach became more selective, with an emphasis on private sponsorship over government-assisted refugee programs.
Proposed Formula: Poilievre’s plan proposes using home construction rates from the previous year as a guide to determine immigration levels, ensuring that Canada does not admit more people than it can house.
Addressing the Housing Crisis
Housing Surplus: Poilievre believes that by reducing immigration levels, Canada could achieve a housing surplus within four years, helping to address the ongoing housing shortage.
Real Estate Stabilization: With reduced demand, the real estate market may see stabilization or even a drop in property prices, ultimately making housing more accessible.
Deportation Policies for Lawbreakers
Immediate Action: Poilievre calls for the deportation of non-citizens who commit crimes while in Canada on temporary visas, responding to incidents like those seen during pro-Hamas protests that involved violence.
Legal Distinction: For crimes committed by Canadian citizens, Poilievre advocates for prosecution through Canada’s judicial system.
Expedited Deportations: Poilievre critiques the current system’s inefficiency in deporting individuals with rejected asylum claims, proposing a faster process to remove those who do not qualify for asylum.
Selective Retention: While generally advocating for stricter controls, Poilievre acknowledges the value of retaining certain illegal immigrants who have integrated well into Canadian society, such as skilled workers contributing to tech hubs like Kitchener-Waterloo.
Refugee Policy Overhaul
Last In, First Out: Poilievre proposes a system in which the most recent arrivals have their claims processed first, in an effort to reduce false claims and the backlog in the system.
Resource Efficiency: This approach could also lead to significant savings in public resources, such as legal proceedings, housing, and welfare, for individuals whose claims are ultimately denied.
Economic, Political, and Social Implications
Labor Market Effects: Lower immigration levels could create short-term labor shortages unless we scale up domestic training or technological solutions.
Social Dynamics: A reduction in new arrivals could impact Canada’s cultural landscape, affecting both diversity and the integration of immigrants into Canadian communities.
Diverse Opinions: While the policy may appeal to those concerned with housing affordability and public safety, critics may argue that it narrows Canada’s global appeal and humanitarian commitments.
Public Sentiment: Polls and public opinion will play a key role in shaping the success of Poilievre’s plan, particularly in light of growing concerns over housing and community safety.
Conclusion
Pierre Poilievre’s proposal to limit immigration to Harper-era levels and enforce stricter deportation policies marks a significant shift in Canada’s immigration strategy. By aiming to balance population growth with available housing, his plan seeks to address Canada’s housing crisis, but it also raises questions about Canada’s reputation as a welcoming nation to immigrants and refugees.
The economic implications, particularly for sectors that rely on immigrant labor, need to be carefully managed. While returning to a more controlled immigration model could stabilize communities, it may also lead to changes in Canada’s social and cultural fabric.
Poilievre’s proposal is likely to spark a wide-ranging debate about Canada’s future identity, economic policies, and social justice priorities. The success of these policies will depend on public support, economic outcomes, and the integration of those already in the country.
As Canada stands at this pivotal moment, the next few years will test the resilience and adaptability of its immigration system.
